Skip to main content
· 10/30/2014

James A. Nohr v. Robert A. McDonald

Citations

  • 27 Vet. App. 124
  • 2014 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1821
  • 2014 WL 5471910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Board erred in denying a veteran’s request for an examiner’s CV when the veteran had identified an ambiguous statement in the examiner’s report that suggested irregularity in the process of selecting the examiner
  • finding that the Board erred in denying a veteran’s request for an examiner’s CV when the veteran had identified an am- biguous statement in the examiner’s report that suggest- ed irregularity in the process of selecting the examiner
  • \[I]t is well-established that the Board must ensure that it provides an appellant fair process in the adjudication of his claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kasold, Schoelen, Greenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.