Deloach v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court has jurisdiction when the appeal “implicate[s] a legal right not to be subjected to a remand”
• holding that this court has jurisdiction when the appeal “implicate[s] a legal right not to be subjected to a remand”
• holding that remand is generally warranted where the Board has not yet performed necessary fact-finding or explicitly weighed the evidence of record
• reiterating that “the evaluation and weighing of evidence are factual determinations committed to the discretion of the factfin-der”
• explaining that reversal is appropriate \where the Board has performed the necessary factfinding and explicitly weighed the evidence\
• explaining that reversal of a Board finding is appropriate where the Board has performed the necessary factfinding and explicitly weighed the evidence and the Court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).