Skip to main content
· 3/10/2004

Robert E. Moody, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Citations

  • 360 F.3d 1306
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4609
  • 2004 WL 433550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the issue of whether prior filings and documents raised claims is a factual inquiry
  • holding that the interpretation of a veteran's filings is a factual inquiry
  • recognizing that the interpretation of veteran's filings is a factual inquiry
  • “The interpretation of these prior filings is essen- tially a factual inquiry, and it is beyond our jurisdiction to make that determination.”
  • “The interpretation of these prior filings is essentially a factual inquiry, and it is beyond our jurisdiction to make that determination.”
  • “The interpretation of these prior filings is es- sentially a factual inquiry, and it is beyond our jurisdiction to make that determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Bryson, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.