Shaw v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court must uphold master’s findings unless report was clearly erroneous or master misconceived legal effect of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ben-Hain v. Tacher
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-10· cited 22×
• Cerase v. Dewhurst
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-02· cited 17×
• Thompson v. Thompson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-07-22· cited 17×
• Bloom v. Bloom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-08· cited 14×
• Matos v. Matos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-01· cited 11×
• Broudy v. Broudy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-14· cited 9×
• Fodor v. Fodor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-02-06· cited 9×
• Reichman v. Reichman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-08· cited 4×
• Mann v. Mann
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-26· cited 1×
• Wright v. Wright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-11-03· cited 1×
• Gass v. Comreal Miami Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12· cited 1×
• Belloise v. Belloise
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-11
• Karter v. Karter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-25

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Claughton v. Claughton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-05-24· cited 17×
• Trotter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-13· cited 1×