Shaw v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it was \not possible to determine that the sole reason [for the husband's termination] was the [previous wrongdoing]\
• a voluntary reduction in income does not constitute a change of circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Herring v. Herring, Jr.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-05-05· cited 4×
• Kathleen Zink v. Bryan Zink
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-04-22· cited 3×
• Wardwell v. Clapp
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-07-15· cited 3×
• Atherton v. Atherton
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2019-03-01· cited 1×