Skip to main content

Sharma v. Vinmar International, Ltd.

Citations

  • 231 S.W.3d 405
  • 2007 WL 177691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellate courts defer to the trial court’s assessments concerning the weight and credibility of the evidence offered in a temporary injunction hearing
  • “That is, the applicant has to establish there is no adequate remedy at law for damages. An adequate remedy at law is one that is as complete, practical, and efficient to the prompt administration of justice as is equitable relief.”
  • “While ordinarily a temporary injunction should operate as a corrective rather than a punitive measure, when a choice must be made between a failure to provide adequate protection of a recognized legal right and the punitive operation of the writ, the latter course must be taken.”
  • “That is, the applicant has to establish there is no adequate remedy at law for damages. An adequate remedy at law is one that is as complete, practical, and efficient to the prompt administration of justice as is equitable relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John S. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.