Rugen v. Interactive Business Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that possession of confidential information and evidence that the defendant was in a position to use it justified an inference of probable irreparable injury
• holding that possession of confidential information and evidence that the defendant was in a position to use it justified an inference of probable irreparable injury
• noting purpose of Rule 683 is to ensure parties are adequately informed of acts they are enjoined from committing and reasons for prohibition
• affirming temporary injunction although noncompetition agreement was unenforceable where parties stipulated information was intended to be kept secret and defendant would gain competitive advantage by use
• noting purpose of Rule 683 is to ensure parties are adequately informed of acts they are enjoined from committing and reasons for prohibition
• affirming temporary injunction although noncompetition agreement was unenforceable where parties stipulated information was intended to be kept secret and defendant would gain competitive advantage by use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).