T-N-T Motorsports, Inc. v. Hennessey Motorsports, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant possessed confidential information and was in a position to use it; thus, appellant was likely to use information to former employer’s detriment
• concluding that injunction complied with Rule 683 in that additional categories of persons were included only to extent they acted or purported to act in concert or participation with named defendants, as required by rule
• noting that customer lists, pricing information, client information, customer preferences, buyer contacts, and market strategies have been shown to be trade secrets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).