Skip to main content
· 10/4/1978

Davis v. Huey

Citations

  • 571 S.W.2d 859
  • 22 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 8
  • 1978 Tex. LEXIS 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellate court erred in its review of a temporary injunction by giving full consideration to the merits of the underlying lawsuit
  • holding that the appellate court erred in its review of a temporary injunction by giving full consideration to the merits of the underlying lawsuit
  • holding that the appellate court erred in its review of a temporary injunction by giving full consideration to the merits of the underlying lawsuit
  • holding that when findings of fact and conclusions of law are not filed, the judgment must be upheld on any legal theory supported in the record
  • holding that when findings of fact and conclusions of law are not filed, the judgment must be upheld on any legal theory supported in the record
  • holding that when findings of fact and conclusions of law are not filed, the judgment must be upheld on any legal theory supported in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.