Stary v. DeBord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that former statutory authorization of interlocutory appeal from order certifying or refusing to certify class action could not be read as authorizing interlocutory appeal from order striking derivative claim
• explaining that court of appeals “erroneously held that it had jurisdiction over an interlocutory order striking a shareholder derivative claim”
• holding that we are to strictly construe statutes allowing interlocutory appeals
• holding that we are to strictly construe statutes allowing interlocutory appeals
• observing that appellate courts may review interlocutory orders “only if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction”
• holding appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).