Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when there was evidence to support its decision
• holding that abuse of discretion does not occur as long as some evidence of substantive and probative character supports trial court’s decision
• recognizing that requirements for establishing right to common-law injunctive relief differ from those where injunctive relief is authorized by statute
• holding that “the trial court does not abuse its discretion if some evidence reasonably supports the trial court’s decision”
• recognizing that requirements for establishing right to common-law injunctive relief differ from those where injunctive relief is authorized by statute
• holding that A the trial court does not abuse its discretion if some evidence reasonably supports the trial court = s decision @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).