Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/16/1997

Sealey v. Giltner

Citations

  • 116 F.3d 47
  • 1997 WL 327344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the receipt of two letters from an inmate complaining of alleged due process violations was insufficient to demonstrate the requisite personal involvement on the part of a prison administrator
  • holding that the receipt of two letters from an inmate complaining of alleged due process violations was insufficient to demonstrate the requisite personal involvement on the part of a prison administrator
  • noting that even after Sandin, courts must determine whether the state has created a liberty interest by statute or regulation
  • emphasizing \desirability of fact-finding before determining whether a prisoner has a liberty interest in remaining free from segregated confinement\
  • relying on cases involving disciplinary segregation in determining whether plaintiff has liberty interest in remaining free of administrative segregation
  • finding that a Department of Corrections Commissioner was not personally involved in alleged constitutional violation where he forwarded plaintiff's letter of complaint to a staff member for decision, and he responded to plaintiff's letter inquiring as to status of matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Leval, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.