Alphonso Samuels v. J. Mockry, G. Hewston, W. Higgins and J. Dowdle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s placement in a limited privileges program may require fact-finding on the liberty interest issue
• explaining that a non-movant “will have his allegations taken as true, and will receive the benefit of the doubt when his assertions conflict with those of the movant” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• the “non-movant may defeat summary judgment only by producing specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial”
• remanding for further fact-finding in accordance with Sandin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).