Skip to main content
· 3/26/1999

Donald Montero v. Brion Travis, Commissioner Kenneth Graber, Commissioner

Citations

  • 171 F.3d 757
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5313
  • 1999 WL 163554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a judge was entitled to immunity from a claim for injunctive relief because the plaintiff “allege[d] neither the violation of a declaratory decree, nor the unavailability of declaratory relief”
  • explaining that parole board officials deciding whether to grant, deny, or revoke parole are engaged in an “adjudicative function”
  • observing that \[a] complaint will be dismissed as ‘frivolous' when ‘it is clear that the defendants are immune from suit'\ in a case involving absolute immunity
  • affirming that “the claim against [parole board chairman] was properly dismissed as frivolous because [plaintiff] never alleged any facts describing [parole board chairman]’s personal involvement in the claimed constitutional violations”
  • applying injunction bar to parole board officials “when they serve a quasi- adjudicative function in deciding whether to grant, deny or revoke parole”
  • finding a claim against a parole board chairman was “properly dismissed as frivolous because [the plaintiff] never alleged any facts describing [the chairman’s] personal involvement in the claimed constitutional violations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Sotomayor, Sand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.