Emmeth Sealey v. T.H. Giltner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 101 days in SHU confinement, though unpleasant and severe, was not atypical and significant
• holding that 101 days in SHU confinement, though unpleasant and severe, was not atypical and significant
• concluding that 101-day confinement in restrictive housing, while “doubtless unpleasant,” did not constitute atypical and significant hardship
• holding that 101-day confinement in restrictive housing unpleasant but not atypical
• finding that 101-day confinement in restrictive housing, while “doubtless unpleasant,” did not constitute atypical and significant hardship
• finding that 101-day confinement in special housing unit, while “doubtless unpleasant,” is “not an atypical and significant hardship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).