Indiana Court of Appeals· 6/25/1996
Scott v. Scott
Citations
- 668 N.E.2d 691
- 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 815
- 1996 WL 344204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding because order did not reveal basis for award either by specific findings or by incorporation of parties' worksheets
- remanding because order did not reveal basis for award either by specific findings or by incorporation of parties' worksheets
- discussing the statutory presumption of equal division and rebuttal of the same
- “We cannot review a support order to determine if it complies with the guidelines unless the order reveals the basis for the amount awarded. Such revelation could be accomplished either by specific findings or by incorporation of a proper worksheet.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharpnack, Kirsch, Garrard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-11-08· cited 230×
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-18· cited 114×
- State v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-05-19· cited 76×
- Clark v. MaddenIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-10· cited 50×
- Meyer v. Marine Builders, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-09-29· cited 36×
- Ratliff v. RatliffIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-03-04· cited 36×
- Hermitage Insurance Co. v. SaltsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-08-31· cited 32×
- In Re Paternity of GRBIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-10· cited 25×
- Pitman v. PitmanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-12-15· cited 24×
- Carter v. DayhuffIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-07· cited 24×
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-03-09· cited 23×
- D.B.M. v. State Ex Rel. A.R.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-11-20· cited 22×
- Bloodgood v. BloodgoodIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-12· cited 22×
- Brown v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-03-18· cited 22×
- Houchens v. BoschertIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-11-26· cited 22×
- Hyde v. HydeIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-07-18· cited 21×
- Warner v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-30· cited 20×
- Wagle v. HenryIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-22· cited 19×
- In Re Adoption of Baby W.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-09-26· cited 18×
- Railing v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-04-23· cited 16×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- DeHaan v. DeHaanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-06-12· cited 154×
- Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-12-22· cited 134×
- McClanahan v. Remington Freight Lines, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-01-06· cited 120×
- W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-03-18· cited 109×
- Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-04-26· cited 54×
- Castaneda v. CastanedaIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-06-15· cited 53×
- Carr v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-10-16· cited 49×
- Stultz v. StultzIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-28· cited 47×
- McGinley-Ellis v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-08-16· cited 47×
- Kirkman v. KirkmanIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-07-06· cited 43×
- Marriage of Merrill v. MerrillIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-03-05· cited 36×
- Berger v. BergerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-03-22· cited 30×
- Euler v. EulerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-11· cited 29×
- Citizens Progress Co. v. James O. Held & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-08-17· cited 28×
- Marriage of Cleary v. ClearyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-12-16· cited 27×
- Esteb v. Enright Ex Rel. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-11-29· cited 26×
- In Re Marriage of SlossIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-08-11· cited 25×
- In Re the Marriage of LewisIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-08-15· cited 23×
- Poynter v. PoynterIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-04-14· cited 21×
- Cobb v. CobbIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-03-24· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.