Skip to main content

Scott v. Scott

Citations

  • 668 N.E.2d 691
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 815
  • 1996 WL 344204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding because order did not reveal basis for award either by specific findings or by incorporation of parties' worksheets
  • remanding because order did not reveal basis for award either by specific findings or by incorporation of parties' worksheets
  • discussing the statutory presumption of equal division and rebuttal of the same
  • “We cannot review a support order to determine if it complies with the guidelines unless the order reveals the basis for the amount awarded. Such revelation could be accomplished either by specific findings or by incorporation of a proper worksheet.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Kirsch, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.