Indiana Court of Appeals· 6/12/1991
DeHaan v. DeHaan
Citations
- 572 N.E.2d 1315
- 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 937
- 1991 WL 101651
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “To interpret ambiguous or uncertain language, both the circumstances surrounding the execution of a contract . . . and the parties’ conduct in connection with the contract may be considered.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ratliff, Conover, Garrard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
117 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-07-29· cited 103×
- Estate of Reasor v. Putnam CountyIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-05-27· cited 90×
- Mitchell v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 84×
- Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-02-04· cited 74×
- Breeden v. BreedenIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-04-11· cited 50×
- Scott v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-06-25· cited 47×
- Ahuja v. Lynco Ltd. Medical ResearchIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-11-19· cited 45×
- In re Marriage of BartleyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-06-10· cited 41×
- Fields v. FieldsIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-06-07· cited 40×
- Marriage of Fiste v. FisteIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-02-02· cited 36×
- Shafer v. LambieIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-07-09· cited 35×
- OVRS Acquisition Corp. v. Community Health Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-10-26· cited 32×
- Capehart v. CapehartIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-02-10· cited 30×
- Kelly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-26· cited 30×
- Lever Bros. Co. v. LangdocIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-09-22· cited 30×
- Reese v. ReeseIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-10-15· cited 29×
- Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance v. EllisonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-06-06· cited 27×
- Skinner v. SkinnerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-12-07· cited 27×
- Marriage of Hodowal v. HodowalIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-31· cited 24×
- Marriage of Nill v. NillIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-01-21· cited 24×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shula v. ShulaIndiana Supreme Court· 1956-03-13· cited 65×
- Loeb v. LoebIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-09-26· cited 58×
- Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-04-26· cited 54×
- Porter v. PorterIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-07-27· cited 52×
- In Re the Marriage of BorenIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 46×
- Rieth-Riley Construction Co. v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-08-21· cited 40×
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorIndiana Supreme Court· 1969-12-10· cited 35×
- Marriage of McBride v. McBrideIndiana Court of Appeals· 1981-11-17· cited 32×
- Rose v. RoseIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-07-28· cited 29×
- Van Riper v. KeimIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-07-07· cited 29×
- Pierce v. YochumIndiana Court of Appeals· 1975-06-12· cited 23×
- Scheetz v. ScheetzIndiana Court of Appeals· 1987-06-24· cited 22×
- Bain v. Board of Trustees of Starke Memorial HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-02-20· cited 22×
- Washington Nat. Corp. v. SEARS, ROEBUCKIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-02-13· cited 20×
- Wellington v. WellingtonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-12-11· cited 18×
- Agrarian Grain Co., Inc. v. MeekerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-08-17· cited 17×
- Planert v. PlanertIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-06-12· cited 17×
- Delaware MacHinery & Tool Company v. YatesIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-10-18· cited 15×
- Marriage of Qazi v. QaziIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-11-30· cited 15×
- Marriage of Caddo v. CaddoIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-09-27· cited 13×
Other cases named DeHaan v. DeHaan
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.