Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 693 N.E.2d 941
  • 1998 Ind. LEXIS 20
  • 1998 WL 100378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the principal holding in State ex rel. Goldsmith was that the disqualification of an individual deputy prosecutor did not mandate the disqualification of the prosecutor or the rest of the prosecutor’s office”
  • counsel not deficient even though at post-conviction hearing he said that if paid more he might have been able to do more
  • “It is only where the evidence is without conflict and leads to but one conclusion, and the post-conviction court has reached the opposite conclusion, that the decision will be disturbed as being contrary to law.”
  • “Irrespective of whether there were problems with the public defender system, in order to claim ineffective assistance of counsel, [defendant] must show that his trial counsel provided deficient performance and that it was prejudicial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Selby, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.