SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disqualifying a law firm because of “the importance of avoiding the appearance of impropriety,” even though Model Rule 1.10(a) did not “clearly mandate” disqualification
• absent exceptional circumstances, “courts could not permit opinion-testimony by an expert originally consulted by an adversary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).