In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated Dec. 18, 1981, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he party seeking discovery must establish need for the material and a practical inability to secure the substantial equivalent thereof by alternate means.”
• work product privilege waived if “the manner of disclosure made it likely that the information would be revealed to an adversary”
• “Disclosure of work product to a party sharing common interests is not inconsistent with the policy of privacy protection underlying the doctrine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).