Skip to main content
· 11/24/1976

United States Ex Rel. Edney v. Smith

Citations

  • 425 F. Supp. 1038
  • 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the sixth amendment does not bar the prosecution’s use of a defense-retained psychiatrist
  • concluding that the sixth amendment does not bar the prosecution's use of a defense-retained psychiatrist
  • “The statements by the defendant to his psychiatrist were not admitted to establish the fact of his having committed the murder, but only to establish a basis for the psychiatrist’s evaluation of petitioner’s sanity at the time of the offense.”
  • “Confidentiality is a sine qua non for successful psychiatric treatment.”
  • court declined to freeze attorney-client-psychiatrist privilege into constitutional form
  • court declined to freeze attorney-client-psychiatrist privilege into constitutional form

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.