· 11/24/1976
United States Ex Rel. Edney v. Smith
Citations
- 425 F. Supp. 1038
- 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the sixth amendment does not bar the prosecution’s use of a defense-retained psychiatrist
- concluding that the sixth amendment does not bar the prosecution's use of a defense-retained psychiatrist
- “The statements by the defendant to his psychiatrist were not admitted to establish the fact of his having committed the murder, but only to establish a basis for the psychiatrist’s evaluation of petitioner’s sanity at the time of the offense.”
- “Confidentiality is a sine qua non for successful psychiatric treatment.”
- court declined to freeze attorney-client-psychiatrist privilege into constitutional form
- court declined to freeze attorney-client-psychiatrist privilege into constitutional form
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weinstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.