Skip to main content
· 7/5/2007

Nidec Corp. v. Victor Co. of Japan

Citations

  • 249 F.R.D. 575
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97465
  • 2007 WL 1994171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the use of 3 omnibus terms such as ‘relating to,’ ‘pertaining to,’ or ‘concerning’ to modify a general 4 category of documents or broad range of information makes a discovery request overly 5 broad on its face
  • finding that AEO designation for severance agreement was unnecessary
  • ordering defendant to supplement its production and interrogatory responses before taking plaintiff’s deposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.