D. New Jersey· 7/18/1990

Leonen v. Johns-Manville

Citations

135 F.R.D. 94
1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19301
1990 WL 275851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that there must be “an identifiable specific claim or impending litigation when the materials were prepared” for the protection to apply
providing that there must be “an identifiable specific claim or impending litigation when the materials were prepared” for the protection to apply
providing that there must be “an identifiable specific claim or impending litigation when the materials were prepared” for the protection to apply
stating privilege protects disclosure of protected document but not disclosure of underlying facts contained in document
“Merely attaching something to a privileged document will not, by itself, make the attachment privileged.”
privilege did not protect the communications with in-house counsel relating to business rather than legal matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.