Skip to main content
· 7/21/2014

Martin O'boyle v. Borough of Longport

Citations

  • 218 N.J. 168
  • 94 A.3d 299
  • 2014 N.J. LEXIS 787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \[a] government record may be excluded from disclosure by other statutory provisions\
  • holding work-product doctrine is not waived where disclosure was “in a manner calculated to preserve its confidentiality”
  • recognizing \intru[sion] on the fact-finding function of litigation\ but recognizing common-interest exception as logical extension of attorney-client privilege
  • recognizing “intru[sion] on the fact-finding function of litigation” but recognizing common-interest exception as logical extension of attorney-client privilege
  • noting that “the party requesting documents must explain why he seeks access to the requested documents” and relating three-part test used for evaluation of such requests
  • noting that “the party requesting documents must explain why he seeks access to the requested documents” and relating three-part test used for evaluation of such requests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cuff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.