Schwind v. EW & Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant company “served the every day needs of the community,” despite selling its services to commercial businesses, who in turn provided the service to its own customers, because the services — computer training— met “an essential need” in today’s world
• rejecting argument that service was intended for resale where defendant company provided computer training services to businesses that in turn provided training services to their own clients
• applying a similar method for calculating an employee’s regular rate of pay as applied here and interpreting § 778.120 as “permit[ting] a court to adopt any method so long as it is ‘reasonable and equitable.’”
• computer training “fundamental to function in today’s society” and therefore served everyday needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).