Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that infrequent supervisory visits were sufficient to evince requisite level of control for purposes of identifying defendant as employer under FLSA
• concluding that because the nurses “have no independent investment in the business” the opportunity for profit or loss prong weighs in favor of finding employee status
• concluding that plaintiffs’ lack of opportunity for profit or loss “weighed heavily in favor of the ... conclusion that the nurses [were] employees”
• holding that nurses were employees of nursing agency which limited working hours to forty per week
• holding that nurses were employees of nursing agency which monitored their patient care notes and visited job sites once or twice a month
• holding that nurses were employees of nursing agency which \unilaterally dictated the nurses' hourly wage\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1988-04-05· cited 140×