S.D. New York· 8/1/2014
Ramirez v. Riverbay Corp.
Citations
- 35 F. Supp. 3d 513
- 2014 WL 3800489
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105870
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that there is “the well-recognized principle that statutory overtime liability accrues when [an employee] works more than forty hours in a given week and is not paid overtime compensation for those hours on the regular payday following that workweek.”
- granting summary judgment to plaintiffs when defendant paid waniytn aepsspelisc, aibnl es uRpuploerst ooff Eavniyd efnocrteh
- finding no preemption where plaintiff did not dispute his entitlement to differentials under the CBA
- denying a motion to dismiss after finding that defendants satisfied only factors two and three of the economic reality test
- granting summary judgment to plaintiffs when defendant paid waniytn aepsspelisc, aibnl es uRpuploerst ooff Eavniyd efnocrteh
- holding no preemption where “plaintiffs do not allege that the CBAs were breached or that the plaintiffs are owed any outstanding nighttime differential pay under the terms of the CBAs” because “[t]here is therefore no dispute about the parties’ rights under the CBAs”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koeltl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wang v. PalmisanoS.D. New York· 2014-09-30· cited 27×
- Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. Kwik Lok Corp.S.D. New York· 2014-09-29· cited 18×
- Macintyre v. MooreW.D. New York· 2018-09-28· cited 11×
- Winfield v. Babylon Beauty School of Smithtown Inc.E.D. New York· 2015-03-07· cited 10×
- Al-Quraan v. 4115 8th St. NW, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2015-07-10· cited 7×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Second Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 4,118×
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementSecond Circuit· 1994-04-27· cited 2,455×
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 2,375×
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court· 2000-05-01· cited 2,025×
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Second Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 1,966×
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,828×
- Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1994-12-19· cited 1,108×
- Jeffreys v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2005-10-17· cited 817×
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court· 1994-06-20· cited 779×
- Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Second Circuit· 2013-03-01· cited 650×
- Goldman v. BeldenSecond Circuit· 1985-02-12· cited 524×
- Scotto v. AlmenasSecond Circuit· 1998-05-05· cited 503×
- Louis Carter v. Dutchess Community CollegeSecond Circuit· 1984-05-14· cited 401×
- Irizarry v. CatsimatidisSecond Circuit· 2013-07-09· cited 329×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.