Louis Carter v. Dutchess Community College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prosecutorial immunity applied to prosecutor’s 14 “conferring with potential witnesses for the purpose of determining whether to initiate 15 proceedings”
• noting that payment of minimum wage to inmates by a community college employer “results in the elimination of unfair competition, not only among employers, but also among workers looking for jobs”
• testifying that if he was the one there he would pay the employees
• borrowing factors from Bonnette v. Cal. Health & Welfare Agency, 704 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1983)
• declining to find “ultimate” control as dispositive but rather asking “who exercises substantial control over a worker”
• setting forth the “economic reality” test for determining whether an employment relationship exists under the FLSA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).