Skip to main content

Bolin v. State

Citations

  • 960 P.2d 784
  • 114 Nev. 503
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • intruding “into the human body for the purpose of taking a blood sample constituted searches within the ambit of the Fourth Amendment and were thus subject to stringent probable cause requirements”
  • abrogated by Richmond v. State, 118 Nev. 924, 934, 59 P.3d 1249, 1256 (2002)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Springer, Shearing, Young, -Concur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.