Skip to main content
· 3/1/1993

Santillanes v. State

Citations

  • 849 P.2d 358
  • 115 N.M. 215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the child abuse statute requires a showing of criminal negligence
  • stating that when a crime is punishable as a felony, a higher mens rea requirement is appropriate
  • stating that strict liability regulatory measures are generally aimed at achieving a societal good, rather than punishing conduct manifesting moral culpability
  • noting that the Court did not have to consider whether child abuse was a strict liability crime because statute contained mens rea elements
  • presuming that the word “negligence” in a criminal statute means criminal as opposed to civil negligence, absent a contrary indication from the Legislature
  • stating that a new interpretation 3 of law would apply to cases pending on appeal in which the relevant issue had been 4 raised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frost, Ransom, Baca, Montgomery, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.