Maresca v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \[i]t is appellant's responsibility to present SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 6 I947A relevant authority and cogent argument\
• recognizing that this court need not consider claims that are not supported by cogent argument or authority
• recognizing that this court need not consider claims that are not supported by cogent argument or authority
• concluding that this court need not address issues not cogently argued and supported by relevant authority
• holding that it is appellant's responsibility to provide cogent argument and relevant authority
• holding that it is appellant's responsibility to provide cogent argument and relevant authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).