Salazar v. BUTTERBALL, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a circuit split over whether donning and doffing personal protective equipment is considered \changing clothes\ under 29 U.S.C. § 203 (o) shows that the term \changing clothes\ is ambiguous
• holding that a circuit split over whether donning and doffing personal protective equipment is No. 17-2109 Valent v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Page 7 considered “changing clothes” under 29 U.S.C. § 203(o) shows that the term “changing clothes” is ambiguous
• holding that a circuit split over whether donning and doffing personal protective equipment is No. 17-2109 Valent v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Page 7 considered “changing clothes” under 29 U.S.C. § 203(o) shows that the term “changing clothes” is ambiguous
• The court concluded that the disputed term was ambiguous in part because of the “differing interpretations of several courts” and a federal agency.
• \clothes\ are \items or garments worn by a person\ and include \knife holders\
• slaughterhouse workers’ frocks, aprons, plastic sleeves, boots, hard hats, ear plugs, safety glasses, mesh gloves, knife holders, and arm guards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).