Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 12/21/1990

Nichols v. Hurley

Citations

  • 921 F.2d 1101
  • 1990 WL 209239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the nonmovant cannot rely on conjecture or speculation to survive summary judgment
  • examining whether employees were “privy to sensitive information” in assessing the intimacy of the working relationship
  • “[B]eing personally accountable to someone other than the elected official means that the employee does not serve solely at the pleasure of the elected official, but of others as well.”
  • \a person can be a member of an elected official's personal staff and not be either a policymaker or an immediate adviser\
  • courts look at “whether the person in the position at issue is personally accountable to only that elected official” (emphasis added)
  • suggesting policymaking is “not pertinent to the personal staff exception”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Barrett, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.