Supreme Court of Florida· 5/1/2008
Russell v. State
Citations
- 982 So. 2d 642
- 2008 WL 1901666
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing hearsay is admissible in violation of probation proceedings, but hearsay alone may not form the sole basis for revocation
- recognizing hearsay is admissible in violation of probation proceedings, but hearsay alone may not form the sole basis for revocation
- explaining that review on appeal is “under an abuse of discretion standard” (citing Bernhardt, 288 So. 2d at 501)
- stating that an appellate court “reviews the trial court’s revocation [of probation] under an abuse of discretion standard”
- holding Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), does not apply to revocation proceedings
- explaining that because Crawford v. Washington addresses the use of testimonial hearsay only in the context of a “criminal prosecution,” the decision in Crawford does not apply to probation revocation proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quince
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Savage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-30· cited 46×
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-31· cited 33×
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-05-01· cited 28×
- McDoughall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-05· cited 15×
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-09· cited 11×
- Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-04· cited 10×
- State of Florida v. Kyle R. QueiorSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-04-21· cited 10×
- Mata v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-24· cited 9×
- Whitehead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-02· cited 9×
- Casas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-10· cited 5×
- Kelvin Crapps v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-28· cited 5×
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-05· cited 4×
- TIMOTHY TURNER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-19· cited 4×
- Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-29· cited 4×
- Kalmbach v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-29· cited 3×
- State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-05· cited 3×
- Rodgers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-14· cited 3×
- Zelaya v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-23· cited 3×
- SILIMON v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-18· cited 2×
- Michael v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-07· cited 2×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-01-09· cited 182×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-05· cited 108×
- Savoie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-11-10· cited 87×
- Cuciak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-01-21· cited 45×
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-05-01· cited 28×
- Morris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-08· cited 26×
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-24· cited 19×
- Peters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-24· cited 18×
- Blair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-14· cited 17×
- Colina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-17· cited 14×
- Santiago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-15· cited 12×
- Russell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-20· cited 7×
- Colwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-05· cited 6×
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-10· cited 6×
- Arndt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.