Supreme Court of Florida· 11/10/1982

Savoie v. State

Citations

422 So. 2d 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that this Court’s “authority to consider issues other than those upon which jurisdiction is based is discretionary with this Court and should be exercised only when these other issues have been properly briefed and argued”
involving an issue that “arose from a denial of a motion to suppress made during trial”
“[O]nce we accept jurisdiction over a cause in order to resolve a legal issue in conflict, we may, in our discretion, consider other issues properly raised and argued before this Court.”
rule governing timing of suppression motions did not preclude trial court from exercising its \inherent power\ to revisit previous ruling on motion to suppress during trial
rule governing timing of suppression motions did not preclude trial court from exercising its “inherent power” to revisit previous ruling on motion to suppress during trial
suspect's attache case searched at scene of arrest after suspect had been handcuffed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Savoie v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.