District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/5/2003
Colwell v. State
Citations
- 838 So. 2d 670
- 2003 WL 728398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an investigating officer’s testimony as to what the victim alleged and a red mark on her neck did not connect the defendant to the assault and was not sufficient evidence to revoke probation
- holding the trial court erred in finding that a battery occurred when the only evidence presented was the responding deputy’s testimony that the intoxicated and hysterical victim had a red mark on her neck and said Colwell grabbed her
- \[T]he deputy's observations alone did not provide a sufficient evidentiary link to the perpetrator of the alleged domestic battery.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Casanueva
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-05-01· cited 67×
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-03-17· cited 41×
- Santiago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-15· cited 12×
- Russell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-20· cited 7×
- Beck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-20· cited 1×
- CARLOS J. SMITH v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-11-12
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.