Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 133 So. 3d 1101
  • 2014 WL 444041
  • 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that rule 3.720(b) “does not define the term ‘submissions’ and neither expressly permits nor prohibits the admission of hearsay evidence”
  • “Although federal law explicitly provides that the federal rules of evidence do not apply at sentencing proceedings, the Florida Evidence Code contains no such parallel provision.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Emas, Logue, Salter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.