Supreme Court of Florida· 1/9/1974
Bernhardt v. State
Citations
- 288 So. 2d 490
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the defendant received \due process ...; the evidence was sufficient to justify revocation; and the trial court did not abuse [its] discretion in revoking probation.\
- explaining that the “underlying concept of probation is rehabilitation rather than punishment and presupposes the fact that probationer is not in prison confinement”
- \[T]he evidence upon which to predicate a revocation [of probation] introduced at the hearing must be sufficient to satisfy the conscience of the court that a condition of probation has been violated.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
171 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1975-03-13· cited 416×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1974-10-31· cited 146×
- Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-04-20· cited 89×
- United States v. Gerald Duane VandemarkNinth Circuit· 1975-07-10· cited 78×
- Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-25· cited 74×
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-05-01· cited 67×
- Singletary v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-03-06· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-23· cited 53×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-10-10· cited 47×
- State v. TerrySupreme Court of Florida· 1976-04-22· cited 46×
- Cuciak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-01-21· cited 45×
- Croteau v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-06-16· cited 38×
- Russ v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-02-26· cited 38×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-08-05· cited 35×
- Robert W. Fowler v. Armond Cross, Commissioner of Florida Parole BoardFifth Circuit· 1981-01-27· cited 34×
- State v. WassillieAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-02-29· cited 33×
- Anderson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1996-04-19· cited 32×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-05-08· cited 32×
- Randolph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-04-02· cited 31×
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-05-01· cited 28×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 1,157×
- Hyser v. ReedD.C. Circuit· 1963-04-11· cited 218×
- In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-01-29· cited 102×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Florida· 1969-12-10· cited 87×
- Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. PowellSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-04-05· cited 75×
- Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIR. AUTH.Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-04-17· cited 70×
- United States v. MotlowSeventh Circuit· 1926-02-25· cited 62×
- Manning v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1947-05-28· cited 59×
- State Ex Rel. Roberts v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida· 1962-01-24· cited 57×
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-01-15· cited 53×
- Newman v. CarsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-11· cited 53×
- In the Matter of William E. WhitneyFirst Circuit· 1970-01-13· cited 51×
- State v. ParnellSupreme Court of Florida· 1969-04-02· cited 42×
- Zachary v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-11-22· cited 39×
- State Ex Rel. Ard v. ShelbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1957-10-22· cited 33×
- In Re Clarification of Florida Rules of Prac. & Pro.Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-31· cited 33×
- Delaney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-09-28· cited 30×
- State v. AugustineSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-06-28· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.