Skip to main content

Roth v. State

Citations

  • 788 A.2d 101
  • 2001 Del. LEXIS 572
  • 2001 WL 1692380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was proper for the trial court to admit testimony describing a defendant’s tattoo of a gun on his back and the words “No Limit,” when the defendant’s aversion to firearms was at issue
  • statement by defendant in armed robbery investigation that he had an aversion to guns could be impeached by testimony regarding the tattoo of a gun on the defendant’s back

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walsh, Holland, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.