Skip to main content

Bruce v. State

Citations

  • 569 A.2d 1254
  • 318 Md. 706
  • 1990 Md. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that inadvertent viewing by jury of handcuffs being removed from defendant as jury was being led into courtroom did not prejudice defendant’s right to fair trial
  • stating that “if the State is aware of prior inconsistent statements made by a witness to a police officer, it may have an obligation to produce this information under the duty to furnish exculpatory evidence. Maryland Rule 4-263(a)(l).”
  • “shackling during trial ... can only be justified by compelling state interests in the specific case”
  • upholding the trial court’s decision to post four plainclothes marshals in addition to two bailiffs as a security measure
  • the police are a part of the prosecution and disclosure requirement applies to them
  • there was a sufficient basis for prosecutor to make missing witness argument with respect to defendant's girlfriend, when defendant testified he was with the girlfriend on the day of the murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chasanow, McAuliffe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.