Skip to main content

State v. Mulkey

Citations

  • 560 A.2d 24
  • 316 Md. 475
  • 1989 Md. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the exact date of the offense is not an essential element, and is not constitutionally required to be set forth”
  • analyzing “reasonable particularity” standard of Rule 4-202(a) in relation to Article 21
  • statutory language stating that “the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars” is an indication of “a mandatory, unqualified intent” on the part of the legislature
  • time of an offense stated in an indictment need not be precise
  • “This language [§ 4610(b) ] indicates a mandatory, unqualified intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.