Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/6/1989
State v. Mulkey
Citations
- 560 A.2d 24
- 316 Md. 475
- 1989 Md. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the exact date of the offense is not an essential element, and is not constitutionally required to be set forth”
- analyzing “reasonable particularity” standard of Rule 4-202(a) in relation to Article 21
- statutory language stating that “the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars” is an indication of “a mandatory, unqualified intent” on the part of the legislature
- time of an offense stated in an indictment need not be precise
- “This language [§ 4610(b) ] indicates a mandatory, unqualified intent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michael E. Valentine v. Khelleh Konteh, WardenSixth Circuit· 2005-01-24· cited 185×
- Borchardt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-13· cited 74×
- Denicolis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-10· cited 67×
- Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-10· cited 53×
- State v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-02-05· cited 51×
- Cooksey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-02· cited 38×
- Harmony v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-05· cited 36×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-10· cited 32×
- State v. LenteNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2019-10-31· cited 28×
- Manuel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-11-14· cited 24×
- State v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-12· cited 22×
- Biggus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-16· cited 21×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-12-21· cited 14×
- People v. WattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-07-06· cited 11×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-02-17· cited 10×
- Shannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-24· cited 10×
- In Re Roneika S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-03· cited 8×
- Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-06-01· cited 8×
- Patrick v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-27· cited 7×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-08· cited 5×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1898-05-23· cited 270×
- Commonwealth v. NiemetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-11-26· cited 109×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-24· cited 100×
- State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-12-28· cited 99×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-06-12· cited 67×
- Ayre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-08-31· cited 64×
- Seidman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-12-28· cited 64×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-01-14· cited 58×
- Bechtel Construction, Inc. v. Laborers District CouncilSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 56×
- State v. MancinoneConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-07-19· cited 54×
- State v. SaracenoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-07-19· cited 53×
- Putnam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-05-05· cited 50×
- State v. D.B.S.Montana Supreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 45×
- State v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-02-23· cited 41×
- Rice v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-06-24· cited 29×
- West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-11-03· cited 29×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-15· cited 29×
- State v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-04-23· cited 27×
- Spector v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-01-22· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.