Skip to main content

Lisle v. State

Citations

  • 941 P.2d 459
  • 113 Nev. 679
  • 1997 Nev. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court must consider possible prejudice to government resulting from two time-consuming, expensive, and duplicative trials
  • holding that trial court must consider possible prejudice to government resulting from two time-consuming, expensive, and duplicative trials
  • holding that merely informing third party that communication between client and counsel occurred does not waive privilege regarding conversation
  • holding that merely informing third party that communication between client and counsel occurred does not waive privilege regarding conversation
  • concluding that notes \prepared in anticipation of litigation . . . are . . . attorney work-product\
  • recognizing that any error in admitting co-defendant’s statement that he saw the “other guy” shoot the victim would be harmless because four other witnesses testified to hearing defendant confess

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Springer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lisle v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.