Nevada Supreme Court· 4/24/1997

Jones v. State

Citations

937 P.2d 55
113 Nev. 454
1997 Nev. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that if a Brady violation had occurred, the alleged error was harmless because the substance of the withheld statements reached the jury
holding that if a Brady violation had occurred, the alleged error was harmless because the substance of the withheld statements reached the jury
stating that district court has discretion to admit or exclude evidence and that decision is reviewed for manifest error
observing that a prosecutor may \argue inferences from the evidence and offer conclusions on contested issues\
concluding \that Nevada case law establishes that failure to endorse a witness constitutes reversible error only where the defendant has been prejudiced by the omission\
stating that either substantial prejudice or prosecutorial bad faith must be shown to warrant reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Springer, Shearing, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.