Skip to main content
· 6/26/1986

Aesoph v. State

Citations

  • 721 P.2d 379
  • 102 Nev. 316
  • 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “defendant’s credibility before the jury was crucial to his defense”
  • cumulative effect of prosecutor’s injection of personal beliefs during closing argument and comments on post-arrest silence mandated reversal of first degree murder conviction
  • cumulative effect of prosecutor’s injection of personal beliefs into argument, combined with comments on post-arrest silence, mandated reversal of conviction of first degree murder
  • cumulative effect of prosecutor's injection of personal beliefs into argument, combined with comments on post-arrest silence, mandated reversal of conviction of first degree murder
  • main issue in the case was self-defense, there were no witnesses, and evidence was circumstantial
  • main issue in the case was self-defense, there were no witnesses, and evidence was circumstantial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.