· 6/26/1986
Aesoph v. State
Citations
- 721 P.2d 379
- 102 Nev. 316
- 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1297
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “defendant’s credibility before the jury was crucial to his defense”
- cumulative effect of prosecutor’s injection of personal beliefs during closing argument and comments on post-arrest silence mandated reversal of first degree murder conviction
- cumulative effect of prosecutor’s injection of personal beliefs into argument, combined with comments on post-arrest silence, mandated reversal of conviction of first degree murder
- cumulative effect of prosecutor's injection of personal beliefs into argument, combined with comments on post-arrest silence, mandated reversal of conviction of first degree murder
- main issue in the case was self-defense, there were no witnesses, and evidence was circumstantial
- main issue in the case was self-defense, there were no witnesses, and evidence was circumstantial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.