Skip to main content

Earl v. State

Citations

  • 904 P.2d 1029
  • 111 Nev. 1304
  • 1995 Nev. LEXIS 156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that district court may refuse instructions where proffered instructions are substantially covered by given instructions
  • stating that it is not reversible error to refuse a jury instruction that is \substantially covered by other instructions\
  • defining deadly force as force likely or intended to cause death or great bodily harm
  • defining deadly force as force likely or intended to cause death or great bodily harm
  • second-degree murder 27 based on implied malice does not require an intentional killing but rather a killing under circumstances that show an abandoned and malignant heart
  • cumulative error where court called the defendant’s testimony “malarkey,” suggested that defense counsel was intoxicated, and proposed in front of the jury to teach defense counsel how to practice law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Springer, Shearing, Rose, Steffen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.