Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 345 S.W.3d 504
  • 2011 WL 322879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of defendant’s sexual assaults he committed while a juvenile at punishment phase of defendant’s aggravated-sexual-assault trial
  • first citing Loredo v. State, 159 S.W.3d 920, 923 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); and then citing TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1
  • “Because Rodriguez’s trial counsel did not identify the objectionable venireperson when he requested an additional peremptory strike, Rodriguez cannot show harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray, Davis, Scoggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.