Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 558 S.W.2d 887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence can be sufficient to show a touching of the genitals even if the victim uses A language different from that in the statute to describe the part of the body touched @
  • recognizing that children often lack the technical knowledge to describe human anatomy and that a child’s use of unsophisticated language to describe sexual organs does not render the evidence insufficient to support a conviction for sexual offenses
  • holding evidence sufficient to show sexual contact where complainant testified appellant touched her “front butt”
  • holding evidence sufficient to show sexual contact where complainant testified appellant touched her \front butt\
  • holding evidence sufficient to show sexual contact where complainant testified appellant touched her “front butt”
  • concluding the definition of “genitals” “includes the vulva which immediately surrounds the vagina”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

164 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.