Indiana Supreme Court· 3/10/2004

Robinson v. State

Citations

805 N.E.2d 783
2004 Ind. LEXIS 229
2004 WL 434202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that claims of sentencing error requiring consideration of matters outside the face of the sentencing judgment may not be presented by way of a motion to correct erroneous sentence
noting that a defendant may challenge a trial court’s award of credit time on direct appeal
stating that “[u]se of the statutory motion to correct sentence should thus be narrowly confined to claims apparent from the face of the sentencing judgment”
holding “incorrect” the view that “credit time should be initially determined by the DOC, not the trial court”
noting that a claim that the trial court imposed the maximum sentence in partial reliance upon improper aggravators was not appropriate for a motion to correct sentence
noting that a claim that the trial court imposed the maximum sentence in partial reliance upon improper aggravators was not appropriate for a motion to correct sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

159 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.