Skip to main content

Young v. State

Citations

  • 888 N.E.2d 1255
  • 2008 Ind. LEXIS 487
  • 2008 WL 2531193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims for educational credit time may be pursued in post-conviction proceedings but affirming dismissal of peti- tion on other grounds
  • holding that “[state] post‐conviction proceedings are the appropriate procedure for considering properly presented claims for educational credit time”
  • holding that “[state] post‐conviction proceedings are the appropriate procedure for considering properly presented claims for educational credit time”
  • holding that “post-conviction proceedings are the appropriate procedure for considering properly presented claims for educational credit time”
  • holding that “[state] post‐conviction proceedings are the appropriate procedure for considering properly presented claims for educational credit time”
  • holding that when a “petition is not the first for post-conviction relief a petitioner has filed, that petitioner must follow the procedure outlined in P-C.R. 1(12) for filing successive petitions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.