Skip to main content

Funk v. State

Citations

  • 714 N.E.2d 746
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 1286
  • 1999 WL 566812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no fundamental error where the “label applied to the charges may have been facially incorrect, but the substance of the ... charges was proper”
  • evaluating a motion alleging Funk was convicted of a non-existent crime as a motion to correct erroneous sentence, not as a petition for post-conviction relief
  • finding no fundamental error where the “label applied to the charges may have been facially incorrect, but the substance of the intimidation charges was proper”
  • error in title of criminal information referring to non-existent lesser included offense does not require vacating conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Rucker, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.